.png)
Every month, your accounting team needs to close the books. And every month, one task sits at the foundation of that process: bank reconciliation. It's how you confirm that your company's accounting records actually match what's sitting in your bank accounts.
When done right, bank reconciliation catches errors before they compound, spots fraudulent activity early, and gives your finance team confidence in the cash position they're reporting. This guide walks through the core steps, common pitfalls to avoid, and how modern accounting teams are using automation to turn what used to be a multi-day ordeal into a streamlined workflow.
Bank reconciliation is the process that helps you ensure your company's accounting records match your bank statements. It's a core account reconciliation and a way to double-check that the money you think you have matches what's in your company’s bank account. This process is crucial for performing accurate financial reporting and managing cash flow effectively.
The bank reconciliation process plays a pivotal role in producing accurate financial statements as well as establishing solid cash flow management. By understanding and implementing bank reconciliation, you can keep polished financial records, detect any bookkeeping discrepancies, and ensure that your recorded cash balances are precise.
Bank reconciliations can be classified into two main types: month-end and ongoing.
As a key part of the balance sheet reconciliation process, month-end bank reconciliations are performed at the end of each month to ensure that all bank transactions for the period are accounted for.
This process involves matching the bank statement with the company's general ledger account balance, identifying discrepancies, and making necessary adjustments. We’ll dive deeper into how to perform this recon below.
Ongoing bank reconciliations are conducted more frequently, such as weekly or even daily, to maintain real-time accuracy in financial records. These reconciliations typically involve live transaction matching between an accounting system and a live feed from a financial institution, and reduce the risk of errors and fraud.
All finance teams ask the question: how often should I reconcile? The answer isn't one-size-fits-all. While monthly reconciliations align with standard accounting close cycles, many organizations benefit from increased frequency as they scale.
Monthly reconciliations work well for smaller organizations with predictable transaction volumes and strong controls. They align naturally with financial reporting periods, and provide sufficient oversight for low-risk accounts.
Weekly reconciliations suit mid-sized companies experiencing growth or managing moderate transaction volumes. This cadence catches errors before they accumulate, but still remains manageable for accounting teams.
Daily reconciliations become practical for high-volume environments, companies with significant fraud risk, or organizations in regulated industries. Treasury teams at larger organizations often reconcile cash-heavy accounts daily to maintain precise cash positioning.
Real-time or continuous reconciliation leverages automation to match transactions as they occur. This approach works best when supported by robust bank feeds and automated matching tools, turning reconciliation from a more periodic task into an ongoing monitoring process.
Your reconciliation frequency should reflect the risk profile of each account. Consider these factors when establishing your cadence:
Modern bank reconciliation automation tools like Numeric’s Cash Management eliminate the manual burden that traditionally made frequent reconciliation impractical. Automated bank feeds, AI-powered transaction matching, and exception-based workflows allow teams to increase reconciliation frequency without proportionally increasing headcount. This shift ultimately strengthens controls while improving cash visibility.
Start by aligning the bank account balance with the cash balance on your company’s balance sheet. Put both your bank statement and your cash balance side by side. Keep in mind that the balances will rarely match exactly, so don't be alarmed if this is the case.

If using Numeric, AI will scan and pull the balance from any uploaded bank statements to compare directly against the GL total. These balances sit side-by-side in your auto-generated reconciliation report each month.
Next, dive into your bank statement to find transactions that aren’t yet reflected in your company’s books. Look for items such as bank fees, wire transfer fees, and interest income. These transactions might not have been recorded in your books yet because they occurred after your last update. Note these discrepancies for the next steps.
When discrepancies happen, these investigative approaches can help you get to the bottom of them:
Now, turn your attention to your recorded cash balance and identify transactions recorded in your books that don't appear on your bank statement. Two common examples are:
Make a list of these items as they will need to be accounted for to reconcile the balances.
Numeric's deep NetSuite integration gives teams access to transaction-level details across their accounts.This makes bank recons easier, as you can pull up and pivot transactions directly in the Numeric platform.
Automate account reconciliation with Numeric
Once you’ve identified the discrepancies, make any necessary adjustments. This step ensures your records accurately reflect your financial status.
Finally, document the entire reconciliation process, at a minimum capturing who prepared and reviewed the reconciliation and when. This statement should itemize every discrepancy, showing the date, amount, and reason for each adjustment. Proper documentation ensures that you maintain a clear record for future reference and auditing purposes.
Comprehensive documentation serves multiple purposes, including creating an audit trail, maintaining and proving regulatory compliance, and offering fraud investigation support. Your reconciliation documentation is the evidence that your controls actually function as designed.
Required documentation elements include:
How long should you retain bank reconciliation records? The answer depends on your regulatory requirements:
As a result, modern best practice favors digital documentation with:
Digital documentation makes audit preparation faster and reduces the risk of lost or misfiled paper records.

Numeric eliminates the busywork from documentation by automatically recording when a reconciliation has been reviewed and completed, along with any associated comments.
Even experienced accounting teams face recurring obstacles during bank reconciliation. Understanding these challenges and implementing prevention strategies can transform reconciliation from a monthly headache into a controlled, efficient process.
Data entry mistakes are among the most common reconciliation challenges. A single transposed digit or duplicate entry can throw off your entire reconciliation and consume hours of investigation time.
Examples: Transposed numbers ($1,234 entered as $1,243), duplicate entries, missing transactions, incorrect amounts
Prevention Strategies:
Even when transaction amounts are correct, posting to the wrong account creates reconciliation problems and distorts financial reporting across your chart of accounts.
Examples: Posting to wrong accounts, incorrect expense categories, misallocated customer payments
Prevention Strategies:
Not all reconciliation differences indicate errors, and legitimate timing differences that require tracking rather than correction.
Examples: Outstanding checks, deposits in transit, in-process transactions
Prevention Strategies:
Missing or inadequate documentation makes reconciliation investigation difficult and creates audit findings. Without proper supporting evidence, you can't explain or verify adjustments.
Examples: Missing receipts, unclear transaction descriptions, inadequate supporting evidence
Prevention Strategies:
Technology should streamline reconciliation, but system failures, integration problems, and data synchronization errors can create new challenges when not properly managed.
Examples: Bank feed import failures, synchronization errors between systems, software version incompatibilities, corrupted data files
Prevention Strategies:
Even perfect reconciliation preparation fails if review procedures are inadequate. Rubber-stamp approvals, lack of segregation of duties, and insufficient investigation of discrepancies undermine control effectiveness.
Examples: Lack of oversight, no separation of duties, inadequate investigation of discrepancies, rubber-stamp approvals
Prevention Strategies:
Strong bank reconciliation processes share common characteristics: consistency, control, and attention to detail. These practices help accounting teams maintain accuracy while improving efficiency.
Building a resilient reconciliation process requires more than just following steps—it demands intentional design of workflows, controls, and quality standards that scale with your organization.
Consistency is key, and regular reconciliations prevent discrepancies from accumulating.
Aim to reconcile your bank statement at least once a month. Some businesses, particularly those with high-volume financial transactions, may benefit from weekly or even daily ongoing reconciliations to ensure any errors or fraudulent activities are caught early.
Automation can significantly streamline bank reconciliation by cutting down on time-consuming manual tasks and minimizing errors.
For teams looking to move away from a manual reconciliation process and towards finance process automation, close automation accounting software is key.
Since Numeric can automatically pull a company’s trial balance and totals from bank statements, teams automate much of the reconciliation process and can auto-submit recons that are below the materiality threshold.
It’s imperative to maintain detailed sets of records of the current reconciliation process and any adjustments made. Proper documentation is vital for transparency and accountability.
Each step of the reconciliation process should be clearly recorded, including any discrepancies found and the actions taken to resolve them. This practice not only aids in internal reviews but also provides an audit trail.
Never allow the same person to prepare and approve their own reconciliations. Segregation of duties is a fundamental internal control that prevents fraud and catches errors through independent review.
The person reconciling the account should be different from those who process transactions or have check-signing authority. This separation creates natural checkpoints that strengthen your overall control environment.
Not all reconciliation differences warrant the same level of scrutiny. Define clear materiality thresholds that determine when differences require investigation versus when they can be written off or carried forward.
For example, differences under $100 might be investigated only if they appear repeatedly, while variances over $10,000 demand immediate explanation and resolution.
Document these protocols so your team applies consistent judgment across all reconciliations.
Beyond documenting the reconciliation itself, track metrics that indicate process health: average time to complete, number of reconciling items, aging of outstanding items, and frequency of errors discovered.
Periodic quality reviews—whether by internal audit, Controllers, or external firms—identify process weaknesses before they become audit findings. Use these insights to continuously refine your approach.
Don't wait until audit season to organize your reconciliation documentation. Design your process with audit requirements in mind from the start:
When auditors request bank reconciliations, you should be able to provide complete, well-documented evidence within minutes, not days.
As organizations scale, reconciliations can become more complex. What works for a single-entity company with one bank account breaks down when you're managing multiple subsidiaries, currencies, or thousands of daily transactions. Here's how to approach increasingly sophisticated reconciliation scenarios.
Companies processing hundreds or thousands of transactions daily face unique challenges. Manual reconciliation becomes impractical, and even small error rates create significant investigation burdens.
Follow these steps:
Organizations operating globally must reconcile accounts denominated in multiple currencies, introducing foreign exchange gains and losses that complicate the matching process.
Here’s what to keep in mind:
Multi-entity organizations must reconcile not just bank accounts but also intercompany transactions to ensure subsidiary books tie to consolidated financials.
Here’s what to do:
Leading organizations are moving beyond periodic reconciliation toward continuous monitoring that identifies and resolves discrepancies daily or even in real-time.
Continuous reconciliation requires robust system integration, as your accounting platform must sync with bank feeds automatically and frequently. Here’s how to get started:
Real-time reconciliation shifts the focus from period-end scrambling to ongoing maintenance, dramatically reducing month-end close time.
Numeric's Cash Management and Cash Matching products automate 90%+ of bank reconciliations through AI-powered transaction matching and real-time NetSuite integration.

Key capabilities include:
Numeric enables teams to move from month-end fire drills to continuous, controlled reconciliation. Real-time visibility and proactive monitoring catch issues early, reducing stress and improving accuracy.
Numeric is purpose-built for NetSuite users, with deep integration and native support for multi-entity, multi-currency, and complex organizational structures. Schedule a demo to see how Numeric can transform your bank reconciliation process.
Ultimately, bank reconciliation is a relatively straightforward accounting process that is essential for understanding a company’s cash position. Companies that stay on top of bank reconciliation not only keep their accounts in check but can also strengthen their overall financial strategy.