.webp)
The month-end close forms the foundation of your company’s financial data. Naturally then, selecting the best close management software is a key decision for Controllers and accounting managers.
While FloQast can be a great fit — covering the basics of your monthly close checklist and reconciliations — for teams looking for more power, cheaper alternatives, or who are just curious about what else is on the market, we’ve compiled a shortlist of alternatives to explore.
In this article, we help you navigate the maze of software choices, listing the top FloQast competitors and explaining when it makes sense to consider each choice.
To rank the top FloQast alternatives, we considered accounting tools and capabilities, integrations with ERPs and other platforms, ease of implementation and use, customer reviews, and common pros and cons.
The six best FloQast competitors are:
You’ll spend quite a bit of time in your month-end close tool. So it’s important that it’s easy to use, modern, and powerful enough to streamline closing.
When choosing the best FloQast competitors, we focused on the following aspects and factors:

Numeric ranks as the top FloQast alternative. An up-and-comer in the close management space with plenty of momentum, Numeric has focused on bringing tech advances (like AI, best-in-class design, and deep database integrations) to the world of accounting.
While other close management tools provide primarily a month-end checklist to manage tasks, Numeric has created a workspace for the close — teams actively generate accounting policies and get technical accounting guidance using AI, automate reconciliations, generate flux explanations, report flexibly, and have full team-wide visibility into the status of their close.
Powerful, without being complicated, Numeric’s transaction-level syncs save users time spotting changes since an account was last reconciled, and task dependencies outline the full order of operations of the close.
Rated the close management software with the highest user adoption, the easiest admin, and the choice teams were most likely to recommend out of mid-market options — Numeric is quickly grabbing attention by tech-forward accounting teams.
Numeric is the up and comer in the financial close management space quickly gaining traction with leading accounting teams. By leveraging transaction-line ERP syncs and AI to streamline month-end close, Numeric helps accounting teams automate account reconciliations, auto-draft flux analysis, and monitor transactions for a more proactive close.
Numeric offers a Starter plan that's focused on close management and then Growth and Enterprise paid plans that incorporate account reconciliation, flux analysis, search, and reporting capabilities.

The extremely intuitive and straightforward implementation is one of the benefits that make Numeric the top FloQast alternative. The setup process requires the following steps:
Teams are able to close with Numeric in the first month in which they sign up for the product.
Most customers have evaluated Numeric with 5 stars.
Happy customers praise the ability to shorten the monthly close process by at least a day, the real-time visibility, and the ahead-of-the-curve use of AI. Users also call out the advanced automations, easy progress tracking, and the deeper ERP system integrations.
In reviews, Numeric users also highlight the intuitive interface and dashboard with straightforward team collaboration across accounting and finance teams. All in all, the platform helps boost efficiency considerably.
To get started with Numeric, prospective customers can schedule a demo with the team to learn more about reconciliations and flux analysis.

As one of the most popular FloQast alternatives, BlackLine tends to be a good option for large businesses and organizations that need powerful automations within their accounting processes but that also have the necessary human and financial resources to support the setup and proper use.
As the most mature player in the space, BlackLine works with large, public companies and has been in business the longest. Typically, teams that adopt BlackLine require a full-time administrator to implement and maintain the platform.
BlackLine gives access to the following tools and features necessary for financial close management:
BlackLine offers different plans, depending on access to features and size of the team. All in all, comparison between FloQast vs BlackLine shows that the latter ends up being more expensive than the former as well as the majority of alternative solutions. Frequently, there are one-time and recurring costs including but not limited to implementation fees, configuration fees, integration fees, data migration fees, the annual subscription, and administrative services costs. BlackLine does not provide a free trial.
BlackLine has one of the more time-consuming onboarding processes among all FloQast competitors. On average, teams need 4.5 months to get started with BlackLine.
The setup up process requires:
However, much of the time required for on-boarding is a direct reflection of the advanced customization options. The BlackLine customer success team provides support throughout the process, but may charge separate setup, integration, or data migration fees.
Most BlackLine rankings are 4 and 5 stars.
Satisfied BlackLine customers mention the tracking capacities, the matching system, the elimination of manual tasks, the reporting centralization, and the availability of the customer support team.
Meanwhile, some customers report difficulties in implementation and usage and the need for a dedicated administrator.
To get started with BlackLine, customers need to schedule a demo via the company website.

Cube is a good alternative to FloQast for teams that enjoy working in Excel spreadsheets or Google Sheets and would like a lightweight way to continue working in spreadsheets even after implementing financial management accounting SaaS. The platform is also a top choice for companies in which the accounting team owns forecasting.
Cube offers access to:
Unlike other FloQast alternatives, Cube breaks down available plans on the company website. The company offers three subscription plans to meet the requirements of teams with different sizes and varying needs.
Cube does not offer a free trial and there is no free plan.
The process of getting started with Cube is relatively easy, at least as outlined on the Cube website, including the following steps:
Most customers have given Cube 4 or 5 stars in their online reviews.
On the positive side, customers enjoy the platform as an extension of tools they are already familiar with (spreadsheets) making it relatively user-friendly, the budgeting and forecasting functionalities, the degree of flexibility in data aggregation, and the helpful customer support.
On the negative side, customers mention the implementation, the absence of some features such as headcount planning or robust forecasting, the slow updating and processing of multiple reports, and the considerable learning curve.
To get started with Cute, customers need to book a demo on the company website.

Adra by Trintech provides an alternative to FloQast for teams that consider integration with Workday to be an integral part of the decision-making process.
The main features provided by Adra by Trintech are:
The company website does not provide information on the pricing model for the product, and there are no estimates on third-party websites. Interested customers need to get in touch with Adra by Trintech and ask for a quote.
Adra by Trintech does not explain the implementation process step by step. Nevertheless, the customer success team delivers a detailed introduction to the product during the setup stage.
The majority of customer reviews of Adra by Trintech comprise 4 and 5 stars.
Positive reviews discuss the detailed introduction at launch, the ability to continue adding data at all times, the accurate reconciliations, the good task management tool, the automation, and the great customer support staff.
Some negative aspects mentioned in customer reviews include limited customization options, sometimes difficult to find and use menus, and sluggishness when updating or when used by multiple team members simultaneously.
To get started with Adra by Trintech, customers need to request a demo via the company website.

Unlike other FloQast competitors, OneStream provides advanced integration with FP&A tools for planning, budgeting, and forecasting. This makes OneStream a good fit for companies looking to incorporate financial planning and analysis within the same platform.
As an alternative to FloQast, OneStream offers the following features:
OneSteam does not provide information on the cost of the platform on the company website. Based on online customer reviews, OneStream is more costly than other FloQast competitors.
On their website, OneStream does not explain the onboarding process and how involved the customer success team is. The company offers multiple options for advanced training that are likely to be paid.
Most customers have given OneStream 4 or 5 stars on the G2 review platform.
Customers mostly benefit from the access to data, the automated operations, the integration with Microsoft applications, the flexible reporting capabilities, and the customization options.
At the same time, according to customers, metadata management can be inefficient, monthly close performance is rather slow, and implementation and customization can be complex.
To get started with OneStream software, customers need to sign up for a demo via the company website.

Finally, Workiva is a FloQast alternative that brings together a variety of finance and accounting tools under its umbrella, primarily used by public companies. This could be a good fit for businesses that are already reporting within Workiva and are now looking for a close management accounting software that integrates within the same platform.
The most important capabilities available with Workiva include:
The Workiva website does not discuss the subscription plan options and the pricing structure. There is no related information on third-party sources either.
While the Workiva website does not outline the steps of the implementation process, the setup process is driven by the specific subset of Workiva’s cloud-based platform features and the team size.
The majority of online customer reviews comprise 4 or 5 stars.
Some customers like the dynamic and adaptable product, the professional design, the efficient document management, and the real-time collaboration.
Meanwhile, customers voiced concerns with the difficult implementation, the lack of appropriate drag-and-drop features, and the inefficient process to roll forward.
To get started with Workiva, customers need to schedule a demo through the company website.
Ultimately, choosing the right close management tool is dependent on your specific team needs. Is it important to integrate with FP&A tools? What ERP does your company currently use? How does easy of use stack rank against other priorities?
The best way to sift through the choices after reading this breakdown is to select a few to demo, ask your specific set of questions, and better understand the impact each tool will have on your team’s work.
If you’re looking to evaluate options immediately, get started on Numeric’s close management tool here.