.png)
Where does your close process stand? How does your month-end close stack up against others in the industry?
Often the fastest (but only remotely helpful) yardstick available is comparing days to close.
But benchmarks on how long accounting teams take to close leave out nuances specific to your industry, dependencies across entities or departments, and accounting team size.
A 5 day close on one team may still be rife with inefficiency. A 7 day close on another team may be a well-oiled, insightful machine. So, we feel it’s more important to evaluate close processes qualitatively than through rigid quantitative metrics.
Below, we’ll walk through our month-end close maturity model – a reference we created so teams can see where their close process currently stands and where it can evolve next.
This model isn’t built on assumptions; it’s the product of hundreds of conversations we’ve had with accounting teams and consultants about the makeup of company closes.
These are the four core stages of close maturity:

Next, we’ve broken down core characteristics of each stage, common challenges, and actions to progress to the next level of maturity.

Month-end close processes in the Ad Hoc stage, perhaps the easiest stage to identify, are disorganized and tend to look different month-to-month. Each month can feel like a scramble. Periods are frequently re-opened and the close process tends to be focused on the basics of core accounts, like cash, revenue, and payroll.
Month-end drags on and on — leaving little time for work that’s not directly related to the close. The value that the accounting team provides is baseline compliance and covering bases for invoices, payroll, bills, etc.
In most organizations, accounting teams at this stage are removed from business decisions and can be perceived as existing to check necessary boxes for the business to continue functioning.
The core challenge is simply keeping up with the pace of business progress and getting to a level of completeness needed that the period can be closed.
If you read the above characteristics and it all rings true — don’t worry. Everyone begins somewhere.
Often, there’s legitimate rationale behind ad hoc closing — your accounting team may be barebones, you’re far away from an audit, or the business is small enough that this style of closing is adequate.
Yet as the company grows, Ad Hoc closing fails to scale and the importance of having sound, reliable financials increases. The first step in making the leap to a documented close is taking pen to paper and drafting out a month-end close checklist.
Begin building SOPs for close tasks, noting the preparers, reviewers, and target due dates (to assist, you can also use our templates to get a head start.) Then each additional close, layer in context, tighten timelines, and start committing set dates to your business for when financials will be ready.

Accounting teams generally uplevel their month-end process to the “Documented” stage in response to an upcoming audit, a new Controller or finance hire stepping in, or due to the downstream effects of an Ad Hoc close process piling up.
At this stage, the close starts to feel more manageable and has a clear end in sight. There’s a known, repeatable playbook which enables the team to make incremental improvements over time and, consequently, days continue to be shaved off the close.
With a clear, organized close process, the accounting team now reliably provides financial data to the business on a known date. At this stage, the value of the team begins to expand beyond “box checking” as financial data is known to be accurate and actionable. With reliable month-end reporting, the accounting team begins to provide a clear picture of the business’ financial health.
While the team is leagues beyond the value provided in the Ad Hoc stage, given the volume of manual tasks required in the month-end close, there remains little time for one-off projects or real advising to the business.
Getting to this step alone is a huge achievement. You’re likely audit-ready and have made strides in compressing your time to close.
The key to advancing to an automated close starts with your well documented month-end checklist. Which steps are taking up the lion’s share of time? Which steps are most often pushed? As the business grows, in what areas will you actively need to hire additional headcount if processes remain as is? Sometimes, adding in (or converting a current employee to) an accounting operations role can make a big difference.
Pick one or two friction points and carve out time to research if a systems integration, a new software, or an existing feature of your current software could automate some or all of the manual work involved.


Naturally, once a close process has been clearly documented, inefficiencies become clearer.
The next stage in maturity requires a concerted effort to automate manual work across the close process by evaluating all components of the close for possible efficiency gains.
While arriving at the Documented stage consisted of creating a clear month-end checklist, the focus of the “Automated” stage is eliminating the manual work involved in as many of the checklist tasks as possible.
This stage heavily relies on a strong accounting tech stack and typically translates to a faster close with greater accuracy, even as the company scales and accounting headcount remains constant. Team members increasingly shift from “preparer” to “reviewer” roles, with automation across the tech stack taking the first pass at manual tasks.
With a compressed close timeline, the accounting team increasingly spends more time on analysis and pulling insights from underlying data. Flux explanations provide a clear portrait of material changes in the business and reporting is reliable, actionable, and fast enough to inform a larger array of business decisions.
With less time spent on manual, recurring tasks, the accounting team is now able to provide real line of sight into business operations and has the bandwidth to tackle special projects that move the business forward, like research into tax implications or partnering on a redesign of the sales commissions structure.
At this stage, the team is starting to be seen as true strategic partners to the business.
The close is in good shape by this point and investments in documentation and automation are paying off with accurate, timely, and audit-ready financials. Progressing to the next stage requires focusing in two areas: pre-close workflows and relationships outside of the finance team.
Again, using the starting point of your month-end checklist, begin by identifying where an ongoing check would reduce time spent during month-end. For teams on Numeric, this typically involves putting in place their first set of transaction monitors to catch items like transactions without a vendor or where JEs were booked to specific accounts. The focus is largely on flagging transactions that may be anomalies in real-time.
On the relationships front, a proactive close involves a high amount of collaboration with teams outside of finance to provide the business with actionable insights. Invest in understanding what insights from financial data would enable better decision-making, who on the team is the best point of contact to deliver those insights to, and the cadence of reporting needed for that specific department.

The final stage of close maturity is documented, automated, and increasingly proactive with the bulk of the traditional “month-end” close being completed in real-time.
The close is also proactive in the level of integration with the business — every close relays clear insights into what is happening with the business, department-level analytics to drive decision-making, and conversations with core stakeholders that translate financial data into improved operations.
Ultimately, at this phase the significance of “month-end” reporting actually begins to decline – at nearly all times the accounting team is able to pull meaningful reporting and provide a snapshot of the business’ health. The month-end close exists to drive a higher level of accuracy and proper controls, but financial data is actionable at nearly every moment.
At this stage, the value of the accounting team is clear — the team acts as strategic advisors to the business, informing decision-making with strong financial data.
The accounting team is integrated into the business, playing a role in navigating conversations on finance implications for acquisitions, new product rollouts or pricing models, or shifts in compensation structure. With stronger real-time financial data, the business is now able to make mid-month pivots (ex. Advising to up marketing campaign spend after analyzing revenue performance), without the delay of month-end reporting.
At this stage with far less time spent on manual closing activities and more work shifted across the month, the lines are blurred between the FP&A and accounting teams, with the entire department focused on explaining the “why” and implications of financial data.
The accounting team consistently has time to benchmark performance, ask for vendor discounts, and tackle technical accounting or tax projects with material impact.
In producing the month-end maturity model, our goal is to provide accounting teams with shared language and a framework to drive continuous improvements in their month-end close.
For Controllers or CFOs, use the model as a lens to pinpoint where your team stands and chart the path to a stronger month-end close.

For the most thorough evaluation of your close process, consider layering the maturity model with our financial close scorecard.
This scorecard provides evaluation criteria for eight distinct categories, all of which we formed after speaking with accounting teams about their internal close KPIs. They are as follows:
To use the template, score your team’s performance for each category using a 1-7 Likert scale where 1 = Strongly disagree; 2 = somewhat disagree; 3 = slightly disagree; 4 = neutral, and so on and so forth.
By measuring progress via the scorecard, it’s easier to assess if your team seems to be moving up in the month-end close maturity model as well.
Numeric works with accounting teams across the close maturity model to implement well-documented, automated, and proactive month-end processes with close automation software.
Get started with Numeric’s close checklist, a project management tool purpose-built for accounting teams. There, you can organize your month-end close process, map out dependencies, and provide full visibility on the status of your close.
With Numeric’s AI Insights, you can also generate exec-ready reports of close performance to-date and see which tasks are moving slower than usual versus prior periods.
Numeric enables teams to automate reconciliations, leverage AI for flux analysis, and reduce the manual work involved in their month-end close.
Cash reconciliations, one of the most tedious workflows in accounting, can be automated by 90+% using Numeric’s Cash Management tool. Teams like Brex rely on Numeric’s cash tooling to automate JE posting, match 90+% of their cash accounts, and sync up to each of their hundreds of bank accounts.
Numeric empowers accounting teams with real-time transaction monitoring to flag anomalies and ensure compliance with accounting policies. With flexible reporting and search tools, teams use Numeric to quickly elevate insights to the business and integrate more closely with the FP&A function.
Interested in exploring how to uplevel the maturity of your close process? Schedule a conversation with our team.